66 results
tagged
corona-virus
Oh the places you can’t go
Design fiction, reality, who can tell? This zine explores the blurry line between fantasy and reality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This is a case where optimism may be an existential threat.
Misinformatie: Massaal delen bezorgde burgers ongefundeerde artikelen en video’s over het coronavirus. Die komen in veel gevallen van commerciële producenten. „Facebook zorgt voor het bereik, Google voor het geld.”
De huidige plannen van het kabinet om burgers via hun telefoon te volgen in de strijd tegen Covid-19 vormen een te groot privacyrisico. Voorzitter Aleid Wolfsen, van de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, zegt dat ze strijdig zijn met Europese wetgeving..
Welcome to week five of the Track(ed) Together newsletter – your weekly update on the digital surveillance tools being deployed to combat Covid-19. In the past, these newsletters have focused on how governments are hoping to suppress the virus by tracking citizens, but this week we’re focusing on another growing phenomenon – the rise of workplace surveillance.
The pandemic is not the first crisis (if we can say so) that hit capitalism all over the world. what is the difference between this one and the previous crisis? The obvious one is that Covid-19 de…
De wereld na corona: Historicus Adam Tooze ziet dat de wereld nooit eerder maatregelen nam zoals nu. Dat wil niet zeggen dat we het klimaat ook zo voortvarend gaan aanpakken.
A clever new product by Danielle Baskin is a remedy to current challenges with facial recognition software. The San Francisco-based designer recently launched Maskalike, a company that prints custom face coverings with photographs of the wearer. Made of machine-washable cotton, the functional masks
Nederland overleefde per decreet de coronacrisis. Toen het kabinet een wettelijke basis wilde geven aan alle vergaande maatregelen, ontwierp het haastig een blauwdruk voor een gezondheidsdictatuur. Politiek dagboek over een politiek-bestuurlijke klasse die de essentie van democratie uit het oog is verloren.
Google and Apple forced governments to follow tighter privacy standards for coronavirus contact-tracing apps. This sounds like good news, but it also reveals our dependency on Big Tech.
Triage: Wie het principe van ‘fair innings’ uit het nooddraaiboek voor de intensieve zorg afwijst, verwerpt ook het uitgangspunt van menselijke gelijkwaardigheid, meent rechtsfilosoof Roland Pierik.
Triage: Wie het principe van ‘fair innings’ uit het nooddraaiboek voor de intensieve zorg afwijst, verwerpt ook het uitgangspunt van menselijke gelijkwaardigheid, meent rechtsfilosoof Roland Pierik.
Google en Apple bepalen nu de voorwaarden waaronder overheden een corona-app met bluetooth kunnen gebruiken. Misschien is dat niet zo’n goed idee.
A guide to where the biggest risks lie as lockdowns ease
In Latvia we wanted to harness smartphone technology for contact tracing. We ran into a Silicon Valley-built brick wall, says Ieva Ilves, an adviser to the Latvian president
Is the change in posture about the coronavirus based on science or political ideology?
De dagelijkse coronacijfers bevatten nodeloos veel fouten, vinden critici. Daar kunnen slecht onderbouwde beslissingen uit voortkomen. Maar kan het wel anders?
Van een mislukking leer je soms meer dan van een succes, zij het vaak iets anders dan waarop je hoopte. In dit stuk pleit ik voor minder doelmatigheidsdenken – minder utilisme. Van mij mogen de nut…
In many countries, contact-tracing apps were presented as a precondition to end lockdowns. But our Track(ed) Together investigation reveals that many countries are struggling with the technology, turning instead to less high-tech solutions.
Virusdetectie: Covid-19-patiënten scheiden het virus vaak uit via de ontlasting. Bij de rioolwaterzuivering is dit te detecteren. „De flessen gaan de koelkast in.”
We now interrupt our regularly scheduled content to bring you a critical essay on the design world. I promise you that this will also be funny. This morning, the design website Dezeen tweeted a link...
A major security vulnerability in Qatar's COVID-19 contact tracing app exposed sensitive personal details of more than one million people.
A major security vulnerability in Qatar's COVID-19 contact tracing app exposed sensitive personal details of more than one million people.
In opmaat naar de nieuwe corona-app van het Ministerie van VWS startte SETUP haar eigen onderzoek naar corona-apps. Dat leidde tot drie scherpe provotypes, die we net als het ministerie presenteerden in een echte appathon.
A crop of “new” body-worn devices issue alerts about hospital patients, the quarantined, people under house arrest, and workers who fail to social distance.
Fraude en aanvallen: Door de ‘intelligente lockdown’ neemt de afhankelijkheid van internet toe en grijpen cybercriminelen hun kans. De politie ziet vaker WhatsApp-fraude en DDoS-aanvallen.
Benjamin Bratton on the world after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Over the past few weeks, Apple & Google have floated the idea of developing and distributing a digital contact-tracing app that will inform people when they’ve been exposed to someone who’s contracted COVID-19, and communicate to people that they’ve been exposed to you if you later test positive yourself (edit: since writing this, Apple has released a beta of iOS 13 that includes the SDK necessary to begin using this system). Writing this in late April and early May, it feels like we’re desperate for information and weary from not knowing who’s caught COVID-19, who’s still vulnerable, who gets it worse or why, or even how to treat it. We’re desperate for any information we can get our hands on. This proposal by Apple and Google promises to give us some information that we can finally start to work off of. This isn’t going to work, and we need to stop this plan before it gets off the ground. I’ll explain why in this post.
Tweede Wereldoorlog: De Poolse arts Eugeniusz Lazowski nam in de oorlog de Duitse bezetter bij de neus met een nepepidemie. Hij redde er vele levens mee.
A guide to making sense of a problem that is now too big for any one person to fully comprehend
Techgiganten staan te popelen om de overheid te hulp te schieten in deze crisis. Misschien hopen ze dat de wereld hun privacyschendingen vergeet als ze ons van dienst zijn. Maar – spoiler alert – Big Tech gaat de wereld niet redden. Toch doen ze alsof het wel zo is. Zo stellen Apple en Google technologie beschikbaar aan overheden om corona-apps te ontwikkelen. Je kunt met sommige daarvan bijhouden…
Interview | Ian Bremmer: Dit is de eerste grote crisis zonder Amerikaans leiderschap, volgens geopolitiek denker Ian Bremmer. „Dit is een groot probleem voor de EU.”
The long read: The crisis has brought the economy to a near halt, and left millions of people out of work. But thanks to intervention on an unprecedented scale, a full-scale meltdown has been averted – for now
Deze week ging me een licht op. Al jaren praat ik over data, datasturing en databescherming. Om duistere redenen noemen anderen dat beschermingsthema ‘privacy’ en dat heb ik nooit goed begrepen. Maar pas deze week zag ik welk fundamenteel maatschappelijk misverstand door dat rare begrip ‘privacy’ is ontstaan. Ik ga het hier nog eens rustig aan mezelf uitleggen. U kunt meelezen, als u daar het…
Contact tracing will likely require Apple and Google’s support as individual developers and governments will be limited in several areas.
Chinese apps launched myriad features in response to Covid 19, directly supporting the most effective tactics the health system employed. What can we do in Silicon Valley?
They can also reveal symptoms that at first went undetected. I may have found a new one.
The long read: Times of upheaval are always times of radical change. Some believe the pandemic is a once-in-a-generation chance to remake society and build a better future. Others fear it may only make existing injustices worse
The long read: Times of upheaval are always times of radical change. Some believe the pandemic is a once-in-a-generation chance to remake society and build a better future. Others fear it may only make existing injustices worse
And also, in the process, their citizens
The U.S. may end up with the worst COVID-19 outbreak in the industrialized world. This is how it’s going to play out.
Cybertracking, controle van gps-data en gezichtsherkenning: ook in Europa gebruiken overheden alle digitale surveillancemiddelen om tijdens de corona-uitbraak bij te houden waar hun burgers zijn.
These are strange days we are living in. We do not know when the Covid-19 pandemic will end; we do not know how it will end; and, at present, we can only speculate about its long-term political and economic impact. Historians are clear: epidemics are events, not trends. As the historian of medicine Charles Rosenberg has put it, “Epidemics start at a moment in time, proceed on a stage limited in space and duration, follow a plot line of increasing revelatory tension, move to a crisis of individual and collective character, then drift toward closure.” Rosenberg has also argued that epidemics put pressure on the societies they strike. This strain makes visible latent structures that might not otherwise be evident. As a result, epidemics provide a sampling device for social analysis. They reveal what really matters to a population and whom they truly value. Every known epidemic has been framed and explained not simply as a public health crisis but also as a moral crisis. Certain social groups have been blamed for its emergence and spread. This drama is now playing out with Covid-19, first in China and then in many countries worldwide. It is too early for any conclusions about the lasting impact of a major global crisis that has just started, but here are seven early lessons. The first is that the pandemic will force the return of big government. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, many observers believed that crisis-born mistrust in the market would lead to greater faith in the state. This idea was nothing new: in 1929, following the onset of the Great Depression, people demanded strong government intervention to offset the failings of the market. In the 1970s, it was the other way around: people were disappointed with government intervention, so they started to believe in the market again. The paradox of the Great Recession of 2008 is that mistrust in the market did not lead to demand for greater government intervention. Now, the coronavirus will bring the state back in a big way. Covid-19 made people rely on the government to organise their collective defence against the pandemic, and they rely on the government to save a sinking economy. The effectiveness of governments is now measured by their capacity to change people’s everyday behavior. In the context of this crisis, people’s inaction is the most visible action. The second lesson is that the coronavirus provides one more demonstration of the mystique of borders, and will help reassert the role of the nation state within the European Union. One can already see this in the closure of many of the borders between countries – and in the fact that every government in Europe is focusing on its own people. In normal circumstances, member states would make no distinction between the nationalities of patients in their health systems but, in this crisis, they will likely prioritise their citizens over others (this is not a reference to immigrants from other regions but Europeans with EU passports). The coronavirus will strengthen nationalism, albeit not ethnic nationalism but a type of territorial nationalism. In TV reports and in governments’ announcements one can see that that co-nationals travelling from corona-infected areas are as unwelcome as any foreigner. To survive, the government will ask citizens to erect walls not simply between states but between individuals, as the danger of being infected comes from the people they meet most often. It is not the stranger but those closest to you who present the greatest risk. The third lesson of the coronavirus relates to trust in expertise. The 2008 financial crisis and the 2015 refugee crisis generated a great deal of popular discontent with experts. “We don’t trust experts” was the winning cry of the populists. But in the current crisis, professionalism is back. Most people are very open to trusting experts and heeding the science when their own lives are at stake. One can already see the growing legitimacy that this has lent to the professionals who lead the fight against the virus. The return of the state has been made possible because trust in experts has returned. *** The fourth lesson is open to interpretation but very important nonetheless. Unfortunately, the coronavirus could increase the appeal of the kind of big data authoritarianism employed by the Chinese government. One can blame Chinese leaders for the lack of transparency that made them react slowly to the spread of the virus in December 2019, but the efficiency of their response and the Chinese state’s capacity to control the movement and behavior of people has been impressive. In the current crisis, citizens constantly compare the responses and effectiveness of their governments with those of other governments. And we should not be surprised if, the day after the crisis, China looks like a winner and the United States looks like a loser. The crisis will also additionally escalate the America-China confrontation. The US media is openly blaming Beijing for the spread of the coronavirus, while China tries to use the failures of Western democracies to respond effectively to the challenge in order to claim the superiority of its model. The fifth lesson concerns crisis management. What governments learned in dealing with economic crises, the refugee crisis, and terrorist attacks was that panic was their worst enemy. If, for months after a terrorist attack, people changed their everyday behavior and stopped leaving their houses, this would help terrorists achieve their goals. The same was true in 2008: a change in behavior often increased the costs of the financial crisis. So, in the early stage of Covid-19, leaders and citizens responded with messages to “stay calm”, “get on with life”, “ignore the risk”, and “don’t exaggerate”. Now, governments have to tell citizens to change their behavior by staying at home. And governments’ success in this depends on their capacity to scare people into behaving as instructed. “Do not panic” is the wrong message for the Covid-19 crisis. To contain the pandemic, people should panic – and they should drastically change their way of living. While all previous crisis of the 21st century – 9/11; the Great Recession; the refugee crisis – were driven by anxiety, this one is driven by pure fear. People fear infection, they fear for their lives and for the lives of their families. But for how long could people stay home? The sixth lesson is that the Covid-19 crisis will have a strong impact on intergenerational dynamics. In the context of debates about climate change and the risk it presents, younger generations have been critical of their elders for not thinking about the future seriously. The coronavirus reverses these dynamics: now, the older members of society are much more vulnerable and feel threatened by millennials’ visible unwillingness to change their way of living. This intergenerational conflict could intensify if the crisis lasts for a long time. In the classical 20th-century nightmare, a nuclear war threatened to kill almost everybody, and almost at the same time, while in the case of coronavirus, young Europeans who decided to party in the time of new plague risk getting sick for a week while their parents risk dying. The final lesson is that, at a certain point, governments will be forced to choose between containing the spread of the pandemic at the cost of destroying the economy, or tolerating a higher human cost to save the economy. Over time, some may conclude, the cost of a non-working economy will look more threatening than the risk of more infected people. It is still early days in speculating about the long political impact of Covid-19. But it is already clear that it is an anti-globalisation virus, and that the opening of borders and mixing of peoples will be blamed for the catastrophe. Historically, one dramatic aspect of epidemics is the desire to assign responsibility. From Jews in medieval Europe to meat mongers in Chinese markets, someone is always blamed. This discourse of blame exploits existing social divisions of religion, race, ethnicity, class, or gender identity. The coronavirus crisis has justified the fears of the anti-globalists: closed airports and the self-isolated individuals appear to be the ground zero of globalisation. It is ironic that the best way to contain the crisis of individualistic societies was to ask people to wall themselves in their apartment. Social distancing has become the new name for solidarity. But, paradoxically, the new anti-globalist moment could weaken populist political actors who, even when they have a point, do not have a solution. It will be the ultimate irony of history if Donald Trump loses the forthcoming US presidential election because of a radical backlash against globalisation that he championed, and if he ends defeated by a virus that originates from China and has the name of Mexican beer. It remains to be seen exactly how the crisis will affect the future of the European project. The pandemic has dramatically reshaped the EU’s response to all the other crises it has faced in the last decade. Fiscal discipline is no longer the economic mantra, even in Berlin, and there is no European government that, at the present moment, will advocate opening borders to refugees. But it is clear that, ultimately, the coronavirus will call into question some of the basic assumptions on which the EU is founded. What we had not foreseen, as the poet Stephen Spender wrote long ago, is “Wearing of Time/And the watching of the cripple passed/With limbs shaped like questions.” Ivan Krastev is a political scientist, a contributing writer for the New York Times and the chairman of the Centre for Liberal Strategies in Sofia, Bulgaria. His most recent book is The Light that Failed
Pandemics affect men and women differently.
The virus is showing us how our reliance on smartphones renders everyday life more visible – and ultimately more controllable.